Nov 19 2009

Senate Committee Considering a 6 - Month Extension

Published by cmacheska under Uncategorized

On Tuesday a bipartisan group of seven Senate Committee Chairs and Ranking Members, including Environment and Public Works Chairman Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and Ranking Member James Inhofe (R-OK), sent a letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), urging leadership to file cloture and move forward on a 6 – month extension of the surface transportation bill in order to spur job creation and economic recovery. This request is a change from the Senate’s previous assertion for an 18 – month extension, which fell in line with the Obama Administration’s current policy stance. Senator Boxer hopes pulling back from an 18 - month extension will ease the tensions that are arising between House and Senate leaders on how to proceed with the future bill.

 

To follow up on the letter to Leadership, the EPW Committee held a briefing Wednesday afternoon to discuss the ongoing issues related to the surface transportation reauthorization. High ranking Department of Transportation staff including, John Porcari, Deputy Secretary of Transportation and Roy Kienitz, Under Secretary for Policy, testified before the Committee and answered questions relating to a possible six month surface transportation extension in the Senate. Both testified that the Department of Transportation does still back an 18 – month extension, however it was also stated that the Highway Trust Fund is only on track to remain solvent until August 2010. Meaning another infusion will be necessary if a new surface transportation bill, with revised funding mechanisms, is not established. To that point Senator Voinovich (R-OH) made an eloquent argument for the need for Congress to make the difficult decision to raise the nation’s gas tax.

 

Senators also stressed the need to stray away from a continued set of one month extensions in order to provide a bit more funding stability and assurance for state departments of transportation throughout the country. Since SAFETEA-LU expired on September 30, states have had a 30% cut in their highway funding, which is leading to states like Nevada and Illinois to halt many future projects. The Senate hopes that the passage of a six month extension will provide these departments of transportation some more certainty and afford Congress a six month window to work toward a new six year bill. Finally, Senators from both sides of the aisle requested that the Administration come out with an aggressive proposal for a new multi year surface transportation authorization that includes forward thinking mechanisms for funding and sustainable development.  

No responses yet

Nov 17 2009

Transportation Policy Briefing - Watch Live 11:30 AM EST Nov. 17

Published by adickert under Uncategorized

If you have some free time during your lunch hour today, check out this free webcast of National Journal’s Transportation Policy Briefing at 11:30 AM EST on Tuesday, November 17. The event will feature a keynote address from Sen. Tom Carper (D-DE) and a panel of other transportation experts.

Watch the live webcast or archive here.

No responses yet

Nov 06 2009

3 Ways You Can Help Fight Unemployment

The news this morning wasn’t good: unemployment in October climbed to a twenty-five year high of 10.2 percent and is expected to grow. More troubling for those of us in the infrastructure field, last month the economy also lost about 62,000 construction jobs. While the Obama administration estimates on recovery.gov that as of October 30, 640,329 jobs have either been created or saved by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, clearly more must be done to stem the tide of continuing job losses.

 

You know another thing that’s still not getting any better? Yep, that’s right, you guessed it- the nation’s failing infrastructure! It’s been almost 10 months since ASCE graded the nation’s infrastructure at a D and estimated that it would cost $2.2 trillion over five years to bring it up to a good condition – and so far not much has changed.

 

So bad news all around, right? Well, if you don’t want to be too depressed on a Friday afternoon, why not take this opportunity to help put some of this right. We need engineers and anyone who cares about infrastructure to contact their legislators in support of these crucial issues that will improve infrastructure and put people to work:

 

1.                  Surface Transportation System Authorization – the nation’s transportation system has been operating on short-term extensions since SAFETEA-LU expired in September. This lack of action on new policy is keeping states from making long-term transportation plans or hiring new workers. House Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-SC) this week called waiting on an authorization “wrong-headed” when so many people are out of work. Click here to send a message to your legislators instantly.

2.                  Clean Water Trust Fund – the nation’s water infrastructure system faces hundreds of billions of dollars worth of repairs, and yet no sustainable federal revenue source exists to pay for those needs. The Trust Fund would collect money from polluters and those who use water systems for product disposal and distribute it in a consistent manner to states for repair and rehabilitation of essential drinking water and wastewater treatment facilities.  The Fund would raise an estimated $11 billion per year through 2015. Click here to send a message to your legislators instantly.

3.                  Dam Rehabilitation and Repair Act – across the country, thousands of dams are aging. Most of these dams were built prior to development down stream, and now, should they fail, could cause major loss of life and property. The Dam Rehab bill would create a grant program to help states repair and modernize threatened dams. Click here to send a message to your legislators instantly.

 

The speedier travel time, more reliable water systems, and protection from unsafe dams should be reason enough to support any of these above issues. But think about the job someone would get designing, building, or maintaining any of this infrastructure and these pieces of legislation take on even more importance. So ask your elected officials for support today and let people in your community know how important a safe and efficient infrastructure is to our economy. 

One response so far

Oct 27 2009

Are you ready for your close up?

Published by adickert under infrastructure

Could you be the next infrastructure TV star? A nationwide search is underway to find a host for a new major cable network series that will focus on exposing the nation’s failing infrastructure and advocating for restoration and repair.

 

ASCE is sending out a casting call for potential hosts because who better to teach the public about infrastructure than civil engineers who design it, build it, and maintain it.

 

The show’s host will have a dogged dedication to exposing neglected infrastructure, and the fearlessness it takes to stand face-to-face with the powers-that-be and demand change.

 

If you have good communication skills, a wide array of engineering experiences and are committed to improving the nation’s infrastructure, this could be the opportunity for you! Previous on-camera experience is not required. All candidates must submit a bio/resume, recent headshot and candid photo(s), and a statement explaining what makes you a good candidate. Video statements are a plus.

 

Nominations are due no later than October 30.

 

For more information or to submit your nomination, send an email to castingcall@asce.org.

No responses yet

Oct 16 2009

Virginia’s Infrastructure Gets a D+

Published by adickert under Report Card, transportation, water

The Virginia Section of ASCE this week released its 2009 Report Card for Virginia’s Infrastructure. The Old Dominion’s infrastructure rated a D+ overall.

 2009 Report Card for Virginia's Infrastructure

The section’s first Report Card graded 13 infrastructure categories: aviation facilities, bridges, dams, drinking water systems, energy, parks and recreation, ports and navigable waterways, rail and transit, roads, schools, solid waste disposal facilities, stormwater management and wastewater. Individual category grades ranged from a high of B- for parks and recreation, to a low of D- for each of dams, roads and schools. The report also noted that failure to maintain and preserve the state’s resources, and to implement effective long-range infrastructure management plans, is having a negative impact on Virginia’s future.

 

“Commuters are losing hours each day to gridlock; the pipes that carry drinking water into our homes are aging, overused and in some case, contaminated; and our children’s classrooms are becoming increasingly crowded,” said Thomas L. Fitzgerald, section president, and chair of the Report Card Committee. “Robust infrastructure is a vital component of the health of the state’s economy and its ability to attract business and industry. Even more importantly, it is also vital to supporting and protecting the health and safety of Virginians.”

 

The Virginia Section also noted that Dams received a low grade of D- since new state regulations enacted in 2008 nearly doubled the number of dams requiring state inspection. Despite these stricter guidelines, the state has not provided any additional funds to carry out the inspections.

 

To read the full report, visit ASCE Virginia’s website.

 

NBC 12 in Richmond also did a great piece on the Report Card and Virginia’s failing infrastructure.

No responses yet

Oct 08 2009

How Should Planners Promote Livable Communities?

Published by adickert under infrastructure, transportation

The contributors on the National Journal’s Transportation Experts Blog this week are debating how transportation improvements and transformations can make communities more livable. As one of the key goals of the Obama administration, livability is sure to be a hot topic for the next few years. Already, the administration has announced a partnership between the Departments of Transportation and Housing and Urban Development and the Envrionmental Protection Agency to start developing a game plan.

ASCE is pleased to see this shift in thinking and has long advocated for more coordination between infrastructure plans. These livability goals, however, will not be acheived overnight. ASCE’s Executive Director says on the blog that we need to start these plans, but in the short run encourage people to change some of their transportation habits by doing things such as telecommuting or working flexible schedules.

Most everyone agrees that the nation’s transportation infrastructure is in serious condition and that we have to take dramatic action to repair and improve it so we can continue to enjoy its benefits and grow as a nation. Some of the changes we need to make are structural, but many will involve changing our behavior. As we look to plan and design our transportation system of the future, community livability and sustainability will have to be priorities.

Civil engineers have long advocated for mode-neutral planning and increased intermodalism. As we plan the communities of tomorrow, we need to do a better job pairing needs with transportation plans. We also have to give people better alternatives to driving than the ones that already exist. ASCE’s 2009 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure found that only half of Americans have access to public transportation and that only about a quarter of those people consider it a “good” option.

 

To read the rest of the response and see what other contributors are saying, click here.

No responses yet

Sep 29 2009

Will Anti-Tax Sentiment Stall Transportation Reform?

Published by adickert under infrastructure, transportation

This week’s topic on the National Journal’s Tranportation Expert’s Blog wonders about the ability to increase the federal gas tax when anti-tax sentiment can be so passionate.

ASCE’s Executive Director, Pat Natale says:

The “Tea Party” protest that descended on the National Mall this month reminds us that any mention of a tax increase galvanizes a loud and passionate opposition. The anti-tax sentiment is a strong force, but advocates for a safe and efficient transportation system are capable of meeting the challenge as long as we are as willing as the other side to stand up for our principles.

The message may not fit on a bumper sticker as easily as an anti-tax sound bite, but we should still endeavor to inform the public about the benefits of increasing the gas tax. ASCE estimates that almost $740 billion is needed over the next 5 years to bring the road and transit systems up to a “good” level – and that doesn’t take into account the fact that by 2010 the gas tax will have lost half of its purchasing power since it was last raised in 1993. The National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission and the National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission agree that we must raise the gas tax and the federal government needs to take an increased role in surface transportation…

To read the rest of his response and to learn what other contributors on the blog think, go to National Journal.

 

***** ALSO: Don’t forget!!!**** SAFETEA-LU expires tomorrow (September 30, 2009) take this chance to contact your Senators and ask them to support a three month extension of the bill so final details of a full six year bill can be worked out. Send an instant email from ASCE’s Click and Connect with Congress Advocacy Website.

No responses yet

Sep 24 2009

House Passes 3 Month Transportation Extension

Published by adickert under infrastructure, transportation

Thanks to the quick action of ASCE Key Contacts who called their legislators urging support, the U.S. House of Representatives voted last night to approve a three month extension of the federal highway and transit program. The current law authorizing those programs, SAFETEA-LU, expires September 30. The final vote on the extension was passed with what seems like a by a vote of 335 to 85. The bill passed with a majority of Republican members voting in favor, despite the party’s opposition to the bill.

 

As Rep. James Oberstar (D-MN), Chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee and the bill’s sponsor, made clear in his floor speech, transportation has traditionally been a bipartisan issue because everyone realized how integral a safe and efficient system is to the health and economic stability of our country. Just like the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act passed earlier this year, the surface transportation bill will be a tool for maintaining our competiveness and creating economic growth and jobs.

 

What seems to make the Republican leadership oppose efforts Oberstar’s proposals for the nation’s transportation system is the question of a gas tax increase. It’s no secret and it’s not surprising that Mr. Oberstar is in favor of a gas tax increase (as is ASCE and a number of Republicans including T&I Committee Ranking Member John Mica). The gas tax is a user fee: drivers pay it as the cost to use the roads, and that money goes directly to maintaining and building new roads. Unfortunately, the cost of building and maintaining roads and transit systems has gone up and the gas tax hasn’t increased since 1993 to meet those rising costs.

 

Raising taxes will always cause a stir, but when it comes to transportation - the means for getting to work, getting the goods and services we demand, and seeing our loved ones - let’s all pitch in to inform the public (and Members of Congress) how important new revenues are.

 

If you want all the details leading up to passage of the extension, the Congressional Record has the full transcript here.

No responses yet

Sep 22 2009

Business Community Tells Congress and the President to Act on Transportation Now!

Published by adickert under infrastructure, transportation

As designers, builders, and maintainers of the nation’s infrastructure, civil engineers have long urged the immediate reauthorization of the federal surface transportation program to ensure vital investments that protect health and safety and keep the economy moving are made. As the current law, SAFETEA-LU, is about to expire on September 30, ASCE is joined by many of the nation’s leading business groups to push for action now.

 

Today, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the National Association of Manufacturers, the American Trucking Association, and the American Automobile Association sent a joint letter to Congress and the Obama administration asking for prompt action on surface transportation legislation. In the letter the group states,

Our groups represent the users of the system – individuals and businesses that move on our nation’s transportation network. We are the payers of that system. And as payers we know the value that strategic capital investments provide to our national highway, bridge, and public transportation network. These public assets pay dividends to American families, businesses, and the U.S. economy and deliver a long-term value that far exceeds their initial cost

 

Similar to ASCE, these user groups not only want prompt action on transportation legislation, they want the new revenues needed to back it up. All groups are open to any type of financing mechanism, but all agree that increasing the federal motor fuels tax is the easiest and most effective way to ensure that the nation’s transportation system gets the funding it needs.

 

If transportation groups, a.k.a. the people who will be paying the higher fuel taxes, are willing to put their money where their mouths are, why won’t Congress? That across the board support, combined with record high traffic congestion and unemployment, makes it seem like putting people to work to ease the back-up would be a no brainer.

 

The infrastructure investments made in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act were a good start at repairing failing infrastructure and putting people to work, but they won’t last forever. Let’s take this opportunity to keep the nation’s economy and safety on track.

 

Click here to send your Congressional representatives a message supporting action on transportation legislation.

 

Keep up to date on all developments on surface transportation on ASCE’s Transportation Action Page. 

 

 

No responses yet

Sep 10 2009

Should we have a National Freight Policy?

Published by adickert under infrastructure, transportation

That’s the question this week on the National Journal’s Transportation Experts Blog - ASCE’s answer is, yes, definitely!

Freight today rarely travels by truck alone, and the transfer from one mode to the next often adds to costly delays and pollution from idling vehicles. The needs of our global economy demand that we start enhancing and improving connectivity and service to the major intermodal terminals including seaports, airports, rail terminals, ports of entry and inland intermodal terminals. To do this, programs at every level of government need to use a wide range of multimodal options and new technologies when developing their transportation plans. Of course, the key question in all of this is: How do we pay for it?

To read the full post, click here.

No responses yet

Next »